|
Type |
Pros |
Cons
|
|
Gel Cell |
- Better for rough service environments
- Leak proof
Can be installed on its side with small drop in performance Less susceptible to low temperatures
- When charged correctly does not vent much gas
- Low self discharge rate
|
- Higher initial cost than Liquid Cell
- Electrolyte cannot be replaced
- Charging tolerances are tighter; cannot be charged over 14.2V without damage
- Not ideal for use with automotive or unregulated chargers
- NOTE all lead acid batteries sulphate if left discharged and require maintenance charging
|
|
AGM |
- Maintenance-free
- Leak proof when tipped or if case is cracked
- Used for both deep cycle or starting batteries
- Can be installed at any angle (except upside down)
- Shock and vibration resistant
- Minimal gas release when
charged properly
- Low self-discharge rate
- Can be submerged in water without internal damage (battery terminals will corrode)
- Many charge cycles when properly charged
- Better performance for DC loads
|
- Highest initial cost of all three types
- More weight per Ah than wet cells
- Electrolyte cannot be replaced
- NOTE all lead acid batteries sulphate if left discharged and require maintenance charging
|
|
Liquid Cell - also called Flooded Lead Acid
(FLA) |
- Lowest cost to purchase by amp hour
- Less sensitive than the other two styles in accepting higher charging voltages and less expensive / less regulated charging methods
- Good deep cycle performance
|
- Can spill corrosive battery acid
- Must be installed upright
- Requires regular maintenance
- More quickly damaged if left discharged
- NOTE all lead acid batteries sulphate if left discharged and require maintenance charging
- Not suitable for high vibration environments
|